Democrats embrace ‘McCutcheon’ decision

Center for Public Integrity

New ‘jumbo’ joint fundraising committee follows liberals’ harsh criticism of Supreme Court ruling

By email and Dave Levinthal<a href="mailto:dlevinthalr

12:07 pm, August 26, 2014 Updated:12:29 pm, August 26, 2014

Senate Democrats have embraced a new big-money fundraising vehicle — after repeatedly blasting the U.S. Supreme Court decision that made it possible — that could help candidates, state parties and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee tap wealthy donors for even more cash.

The new “jumbo” joint fundraising committee, dubbed the Grassroots Victory Project 2014, marks the Democrats’ first foray into the territory opened up in April after the Supreme Court’s McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commissionruling.

That decision eviscerated the so-called “aggregate” campaign contribution limits that capped at nine the number of candidates a single donor could financially support at the maximum level.

Paperwork recently filed with the Federal Election Commission indicates 26 Democratic candidates and party committees stand to benefit from money raised collectively through the Grassroots Victory Project 2014.

This means that thanks to theMcCutcheon ruling, donors this year may give more than $178,000 a piece to the new Grassroots Victory Project 2014, which would distribute the funds among its 26 members.

Senate Democrats’ de facto reversal onMcCutcheon comes as they brace for a midterm election that will determine whether they cling to a slim Senate majority or lose it to Republicans. The GOP must pick up six seats to win the majority.

Dan Backer, the conservative attorney behind the McCutcheon case, laughed when informed of the Democrats’ new jumbo joint fundraising committee.

“I’m thrilled to help the Democrats demonstrate their hypocrisy,” Backer said. “It’s taking advantage of the freedoms that have been given to them through the McCutcheon decision. They’re dirty free-riders, and I wish them all the best as they raise even more money from the likes of Tom Steyer and George Soros.”

Backer added: “There is no fundamental difference between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to generating as much money as possible for their campaigns.”

DSCC spokesman Justin Barasky declined to comment for this story, saying “we will have more information about our Grassroots Victory Project soon.”

The DSCC has operated a websitetouting a "Grassroots Victory Project" since early this year.

That website argues that Democrats in key states like Arkansas, Iowa and Louisiana are being outspent on the TV airwaves by “the Kochs and their friends,” referring to the conservative billionaires David and Charles Koch, whose political network reportedly plans to spend $290 million ahead of the November election.

“To fight back, we’ve launched an unprecedented midterm field program: The Grassroots Victory Project!” the DSCC website continues.

In addition to the DSCC, the Grassroots Victory Project 2014 committee includes 11 state and local party committees in battleground states:

Democratic State Central Committee of LouisianaIowa Democratic PartyDemocratic Party of ArkansasColorado Democratic PartyNorth Carolina’s Wake County Democratic Party Federal Campaign CommitteeMichigan Democratic State Central CommitteeGeorgia Federal Election CommitteeAlaska Democratic PartyNew Hampshire Democratic PartyKentucky State Democratic Central Executive CommitteeWest Virginia State Democratic Executive Committee

Fourteen Democratic Senate candidates will also benefit:

Sen. Mark Begich of AlaskaSen. Al Franken of MinnesotaSen. Kay Hagan of North CarolinaSen. Mary Landrieu of LouisianaSen. Jeff Merkley of OregonSen. Mark Pryor of ArkansasSen. Jeanne Shaheen of New HampshireSen. Mark Udall of ColoradoSen. Mark Warner of VirginiaRep. Bruce Braley of IowaRep. Gary Peters of MichiganKentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan GrimesWest Virginia Secretary of State Natalie TennantMichelle Nunn of Georgia

Several Democratic politicians who stand to directly benefit from the new Grassroots Victory Project 2014 have previously blasted the McCutcheondecision in messages to supporters.

Franken, for instance, argued that the Supreme Court had “stripped away some of the last remaining protections against keeping even more money out of our elections.” An email from the Minnesota Democrat email urged his backers to sign a petition to “protect our Democracy” and “stand against”McCutcheon and the 2010 campaign finance ruling Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which allowed corporations to make unlimited expenditures for or against candidates.

Colorado’s Udall, meanwhile, said theMcCutcheon decision is “definitely a good deal for billionaires and special interest groups looking to buy elections.” He added: “Coloradans are tired of outside spending and extreme television ads. Thanks in part to the McCutcheon ruling, we’ll see even more bombarding our airwaves.”

And Nunn, the Georgia Democrat angling to win the state’s open U.S. Senate seat, declared the McCutcheondecision “bad news for anyone who believes that democracy should be about the voices of the many — not a few billionaires.”

All the while, the DSCC’s sister committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee,said this of the McCutcheon decision: “Every voice in America deserves to be heard equally. But the court’s decision in McCutcheon v. FEC allows the ultra-wealthy to drown out middle-class Americans at the polls. We need campaign reform to keep our democracy fair and, quite frankly, democratic.”

As recently as Aug. 13, the DSCC itself lambasted the McCutcheon decision.

“The Supreme Court’s misguided rulings in the Citizens United andMcCutcheon cases have opened the floodgates for secret spending by corporations and billionaires,” it wrote in a fundraising email. “And super-rich right-wing donors like the Kochs have wasted no time in taking advantage of this free-for-all.”

Republicans have been quicker to embrace the loosened campaign finance rules and have created eight jumbo joint fundraising committees in the aftermath ofMcCutcheon.

Some GOP party leaders have evencalled for the "base" contribution limits to be struck down completely.

Alexander Cohen contributed to this report.

Get our email newsletter

Sign up for the Center for Public Integrity’sWatchdog email and get the news you want from the Center when you want it.

Email address

More options ▼

Primary Source

Primary Source keeps you up-to-date on developments in the post-tips.

Stories in this series

Democrats embrace ‘McCutcheon’ decision

By Michael Beckel and Dave Levinthal

August 26, 2014

How much money can a lobbyist make?

By Dave Levinthal and Marcelo Rochabrun

August 26, 2014

Outsiders dominate Alaska’s Senate race

By Michael Beckel

August 19, 2014

Pat Roberts’ merry band of boosters

By Dave Levinthal

August 5, 2014

Watchdog files IRS complaint against Koch-connected 60 Plus Association

By Michael Beckel

July 31, 2014

Campaign shenanigans are top targets for Office of Congressional Ethics

By Dave Levinthal

July 25, 2014

Politicos souring on FEC advice?

By Dave Levinthal

July 22, 2014

Tea party scandal brews FOIA backlog at FEC

By Dave Levinthal

July 18, 2014

How to fix the IRS nonprofit division

By Julie Patel

July 17, 2014

Most senators wait to take e-filing leap

By Michael Beckel

July 16, 2014

Click here for more stories in this blog

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee

Republicans continue to capitalize on ‘McCutcheon’ ruling

By Michael Beckel

June 30, 2014

The ‘McCutcheon’ decision explained — more money to pour into political process

By Michael Beckel

April 22, 2014

Supreme Court ‘McCutcheon’ case could aid GOP

By Michael Beckel

October 7, 2013

More stories about

Politics, Politics of the United States, Democratic Party, Hill Committees, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Republican Party, Political parties in the United States, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Get our email newsletter

Sign up for the Center for Public Integrity’sWatchdog email and get the news you want from the Center when you want it.

Email address

More options ▼

Support investigative journalism

Make a tax-deductible donation to the Center today

Click here to donate online

Other ways to give

What we cover


National Security



Juvenile Justice



Inside Publici

About the Center

About The Center for Public Integrity

Our Organization

Our Funders

Our People

Our Work

About the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use


Follow us






Copyright 2014 The Center for Public Integrity

Supported by:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s